The issue of balance and equipoise has worried great philosophers and thinker or all hues and ideologies-believers and non-believers, half believers and so on.
One part of the mind understands reason and fairly knows what is safe and good for it and the body housing it.
Then the idiotic or impish or the donkey-like part distorts the facts and impulses in myriad ways and this happens even more when more than one human thinking unit is present and the group form and think tank, and the tank is always leaking or ls filled with high-pressure gas ready to explode.
The tendency to defeat oneself for no good reason appears to be inbuilt in our psyche and all thinkers are just attempting to tame or annihilate this tendency- to kill it before it kills us.
Right from Pranayama, Yoga, and any art of living methods canvassed anywhere in any age was an attempt to reach such a realistic balance.
Whether human kind really succeeded in it is a debatable issue.
The use of temporary pacifiers and peacemakers like liquid spirits and drugs and other social sops have also not entirely succeeded.
There is real peace and constancy of mind for a man... and only for a man who is either not yet born, or is already dead.
I agree. One thing that has kept me in reins is that I chant Vishnusahasranamam repeatedly. Substitute that chant with any divine name of any faith and I am confident that it works. Vishnusahasranamam has worked for me for years and years.
My usage about a dead or the unborn is a hyperbole- in fact no one knows a man who is dead or who is not born-I was just articulating the difficult proposition of attaining absolute peace of mind. Only the best among the best may go anywhere near that blissful peace. I was attempting to articulate that concept, albeit inadequately. There can hardly be any difference on that premise. We have to travel long distances even to get the inkling that such a bliss is existing.