Bhakti and Vibhakti are two separate things

 

In Vedas, the language used is Sanskrit.. There is no doubt.

However many expressions and usages may not be in sync with the definitions of later experts like Panini and Pathanjali..and so on..

There was Prakrita before Sanskrit some say and others think that Prakrita and Samskrutam went hand in hand..

With utmost reverence, I have to state that in the study of a language including Sanskrit I would follow the great academic traditions alone.

Bhakti and Vibhakti are two separate things.

Even today we learn of ten verbal forms in Sanskrit.

लट् वर्तमाने लेट् वेदे* भूते लङ् लुङ् लिटस्तथा ।

विध्याशिषोस्तु लिङ्लोटौ लृङ्लृटौ लृट् च भविष्यति ।।

There was a Lakaram or verbal form Let लेट् which was used in Vedas alone and nowhere else ..

I would prefer not to mix bhakti with rules of grammar and lexicology. lat is the present tense. let is in vedas, lang lung and lit for past tense..ling, vidhi ling and asheerling for directions and teaching, lot for benediction, lrung and lrut for future tense.. लट्, लिट्, लुट्, लृट्, लेट्, लोट्, लङ्, लिङ् (विधिलिङ्, आशीर्लिङ्), लुङ्, लृङ् च ..