If one claims that His name is so and so one can understand it.. It is his exclusive right to have his name the way he wants.. Even here, if for social, legal purposes and for identification if he wants to change that name, there are standardized procedures.. If one insists that he will not follow those procedures, he will be at a disadvantage.. This law applies to the most obvious human transactions.
Anyway if he starts calling others names in the manner he thinks proper, the chances are more than not the he will get very thorough beating, and perhaps he may end up in the havens like those at Kilpauk or Kuthiravattom or Oolampaara.. or any other Paagal Khaanaa..
Likewise, if a man presents his ideas, it is better that he prefixes them with a condition "in my (humble) opinion.. Usually even without such a prefix, it is presumed that the statement unless it is presented as a rule or law is just a point of view.. But it is not so when someone issues rejoinders or dissenting notes to any statement. Here the dissenter has to clearly state that the dissent is based on his personal opinion.. That is the accepted rule of decency in real life..
But loudmouths in social media appear to have their own views..
No comments:
Post a Comment