how many innocent consumers are eating these silver coated mittais without knowing that they are consuming toxic and animal content, extracted cruelly. Respected moderator, this item requires wider publicity in whatever vegetarian forums possible.
--- In Iyer123@yahoogroups.com, Meera Neelakantan <meeraneela@...> wrote:
> Indian Sweets with Silver Foil are non-vegetarian
>
> In India, by law, every food item has to have a green doton it, if it
> is vegetarian - and a maroon dot, if it is non-vegetarian. If a
> manufacturer is found to be cheating by mislabelling his product, the
> sentence is many years in jail.
>
> So, how have the mithai (sweets) people not been arrested so far? Milk
> has been treated as vegetarian to appease the powerful dairy lobby,
> but the silver foil or 'varakh' on each mithai cannot by any stretch
> of imagination be considered vegetarian.
>
> 'Beauty Without Cruelty', a Pune-based NGO that investigates into
> product ingredients, has produced a booklet on the varakh industry.
> Here is their report on how it is made.
>
> The varakh-makers select animals at the slaughterhouse. Each animal is
> felt or the softness of its skin before it is killed. This means that
> a substantial number of goat, sheep and cattle are killed specifically
> for the industry. Their skins are soaked in filthy, infested vats for
> 12 days to dehair them. Then, workers peel away the epidermal layer,
> which they call jhilli, just under the top layer of the skin in a
> single piece. These layers are soaked for 30 minutes in another
> decoction to soften them and left to dry on wooden boards.
>
> Once these are dry, the workers cut out square pieces 19 cm by 15 cm.
> These pieces are made into pouches called auzaar and stacked into
> booklets. Each booklet has a cover of thick lamb suede called khol.
> Thin strips of silver called alagaa are placed inside the pouches.
> Workers now hit the booklet with wooden mallets for three hours to
> beat the silver inside into the ultra-thin varakh of a thickness less
> than one micron called '999'. This varakh is then sent to sweet shops.
>
> Here are the statistics that you should know. An animal's skin can
> make 20-25 pieces/pouches only. Each booklet has 360 pouches. One
> booklet is used to make 30,000 varakh pieces - less than the daily
> supply of a single big mithai shop.
>
> About 12,500 animals are killed for one kg of varakh. Every year,
> 30,000 kg of varakh (30 tonnes) are eaten on mithai. 2.5 crore
> booklets are made by varakh companies that keep their slaughterhouse
> connection secret. But the truth is that not only is this industry
> killing animals furiously, much of the animal tissue that the booklet
> is made of remains in the varakh.
>
> Each Jain knows in his heart that varakh is non-vegetarian. But they
> still use these dreadful items of mass destruction to decorate the
> idols of Jain tirthankars. How amazing that the idols of those that
> preached and practised strict non-violence to all creatures should now
> be covered with slaughterhouse derived silver foils. Jains are
> the biggest buyers of the varakh industry. Many try to bluff
> themselves by saying that the varakh is machine-made. 'Beauty Without
> Cruelty' has done a thorough investigation and found that there is not
> a single machine-made varakh piece in this country (or even the world).
>
> On the web, there is one letter from a person, Jalandhra, claiming
> that he has a company which has "fully automatic machines
> manufactured with German
> collaboration to beat silver pieces in between a special Indian
> manufactured paper in a hygienic and controlled atmosphere run round
> the clock by qualified Engineers and experienced R&D team".
> Initially, we were importing the special paper from Germany. But when
> I followed this up, no factory of the given name, or even address, was
> not found.
>
> The production of varakh is done mainly in north India: Patna,
> Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur and Gaya (which is a&n bsp;Buddhist holy
> centre) in Bihar; Kanpur,
> Meerut and Varanasi (the holy city of Hindus) in Uttar Pradesh; and Jaipur,
> Indore, Ahmedabad and Mumbai. The booklets come to them from the
> slaughterhouses of Delhi, Lucknow, Agra and Ratlam.
>
> Not only is varakh non-vegetarian, it is also very bad for your body - whether
> you are vegetarian or not. The silver cannot be digested; therefore,
> there are no benefits from itsconsumption . A study done in November
> 2005 by the Industrial Toxicology Research Centre in Lucknow on varakh
> says that the silver foil available in the market has toxic and
> carcinogenic metals in the thin silver foil, nickel, lead, chromium
> and cadmium.
>
> Over half of the analysed silver foils had lower silver purity than
> the 99.9 per cent purity stipulated by the prevention of food
> adulteration act of India. When such foil enters into the body, it
> releases heavy metals that can lead to cancer. The report also details
> the unhygienic conditions in which workers put silver in small leather
> bags and beat it into foil in filthy shops.
>
> As for me, I think that this year, I will take the mithai shops to
> court for not labelling their products non-vegetarian, before selling
> them. Let us see how many of them go to jail, or have their business
> closed down. I suggest you cut out this article and show it to your
> local sweetshops.
>
>
> Source: http://www.bwcindia.org/Webforms/EducationalGuides/QuarterlyJournal/2009/Win/index.pdf
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo.com.au/plus7
>
--- In Iyer123@yahoogroups.com, Meera Neelakantan <meeraneela@...> wrote:
> Indian Sweets with Silver Foil are non-vegetarian
>
> In India, by law, every food item has to have a green doton it, if it
> is vegetarian - and a maroon dot, if it is non-vegetarian. If a
> manufacturer is found to be cheating by mislabelling his product, the
> sentence is many years in jail.
>
> So, how have the mithai (sweets) people not been arrested so far? Milk
> has been treated as vegetarian to appease the powerful dairy lobby,
> but the silver foil or 'varakh' on each mithai cannot by any stretch
> of imagination be considered vegetarian.
>
> 'Beauty Without Cruelty', a Pune-based NGO that investigates into
> product ingredients, has produced a booklet on the varakh industry.
> Here is their report on how it is made.
>
> The varakh-makers select animals at the slaughterhouse. Each animal is
> felt or the softness of its skin before it is killed. This means that
> a substantial number of goat, sheep and cattle are killed specifically
> for the industry. Their skins are soaked in filthy, infested vats for
> 12 days to dehair them. Then, workers peel away the epidermal layer,
> which they call jhilli, just under the top layer of the skin in a
> single piece. These layers are soaked for 30 minutes in another
> decoction to soften them and left to dry on wooden boards.
>
> Once these are dry, the workers cut out square pieces 19 cm by 15 cm.
> These pieces are made into pouches called auzaar and stacked into
> booklets. Each booklet has a cover of thick lamb suede called khol.
> Thin strips of silver called alagaa are placed inside the pouches.
> Workers now hit the booklet with wooden mallets for three hours to
> beat the silver inside into the ultra-thin varakh of a thickness less
> than one micron called '999'. This varakh is then sent to sweet shops.
>
> Here are the statistics that you should know. An animal's skin can
> make 20-25 pieces/pouches only. Each booklet has 360 pouches. One
> booklet is used to make 30,000 varakh pieces - less than the daily
> supply of a single big mithai shop.
>
> About 12,500 animals are killed for one kg of varakh. Every year,
> 30,000 kg of varakh (30 tonnes) are eaten on mithai. 2.5 crore
> booklets are made by varakh companies that keep their slaughterhouse
> connection secret. But the truth is that not only is this industry
> killing animals furiously, much of the animal tissue that the booklet
> is made of remains in the varakh.
>
> Each Jain knows in his heart that varakh is non-vegetarian. But they
> still use these dreadful items of mass destruction to decorate the
> idols of Jain tirthankars. How amazing that the idols of those that
> preached and practised strict non-violence to all creatures should now
> be covered with slaughterhouse derived silver foils. Jains are
> the biggest buyers of the varakh industry. Many try to bluff
> themselves by saying that the varakh is machine-made. 'Beauty Without
> Cruelty' has done a thorough investigation and found that there is not
> a single machine-made varakh piece in this country (or even the world).
>
> On the web, there is one letter from a person, Jalandhra, claiming
> that he has a company which has "fully automatic machines
> manufactured with German
> collaboration to beat silver pieces in between a special Indian
> manufactured paper in a hygienic and controlled atmosphere run round
> the clock by qualified Engineers and experienced R&D team".
> Initially, we were importing the special paper from Germany. But when
> I followed this up, no factory of the given name, or even address, was
> not found.
>
> The production of varakh is done mainly in north India: Patna,
> Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur and Gaya (which is a&n bsp;Buddhist holy
> centre) in Bihar; Kanpur,
> Meerut and Varanasi (the holy city of Hindus) in Uttar Pradesh; and Jaipur,
> Indore, Ahmedabad and Mumbai. The booklets come to them from the
> slaughterhouses of Delhi, Lucknow, Agra and Ratlam.
>
> Not only is varakh non-vegetarian, it is also very bad for your body - whether
> you are vegetarian or not. The silver cannot be digested; therefore,
> there are no benefits from itsconsumption . A study done in November
> 2005 by the Industrial Toxicology Research Centre in Lucknow on varakh
> says that the silver foil available in the market has toxic and
> carcinogenic metals in the thin silver foil, nickel, lead, chromium
> and cadmium.
>
> Over half of the analysed silver foils had lower silver purity than
> the 99.9 per cent purity stipulated by the prevention of food
> adulteration act of India. When such foil enters into the body, it
> releases heavy metals that can lead to cancer. The report also details
> the unhygienic conditions in which workers put silver in small leather
> bags and beat it into foil in filthy shops.
>
> As for me, I think that this year, I will take the mithai shops to
> court for not labelling their products non-vegetarian, before selling
> them. Let us see how many of them go to jail, or have their business
> closed down. I suggest you cut out this article and show it to your
> local sweetshops.
>
>
> Source: http://www.bwcindia.org/Webforms/EducationalGuides/QuarterlyJournal/2009/Win/index.pdf
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV shows easily, legally, and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo.com.au/plus7
>
Jai Ma. Namaskar. Thank you for a very enlightening piece. Most of us do not know or understand the provence of items such as gelatin, often used in medicines, and processed foods without our knowledge. In many cases, refined white sugar is bleached by animal bone charcoal, which indiscriminately employ bones of pigs, Gomata, goats, etc. Although there is agnishuddhi, similar to roasting a metal vessel defiled by certain circumstances, it is difficult to extend this vyavasthA to animal bones.
ReplyDeleteOne other thing has been bothering me for years, and i should be most grateful for someone to educate me on this issue. Silk, pattavastra, is made by killing tens of thousands of the silk moth larvae that feeds on mulberry leaves, and on oak for tasar silk. the pupae emerges as a fully formed silk moth by cutting through the cocoon, which is composed of ONE continuos silk filament almost a kilometer in length. By cutting a hole to emerge, this continuous filament is cut at many palces, making reeling very difficult. Also, the moth immediately after emerging evacuates its bowels on the cocoon. This permanently stains any silk made from these types of pierced cocoons. IN Bangabhumi, this tyep of silk is called KAYTAY, i.e. "that which has been cut". There is huge appreciation in this region for the rough texture and variegation in browns, that is characteristic of this pierced silk. However, the moth pupa has a chance to live out its life cycle, short though it is. It is bron with no mouth parts, and so dies immediately after mating and laying eggs for the next cycle. But no matter, this is how Nature has chosen to create its life cycle. Deepriving it of live while it is undergoing metamorphosis within the cocoon, and that too by heating in the sun and boiling, is killing. How can the fine silks produced from this basic principle be thought of as non-violent and pure?
There is another silk named ENDI or ERI, common in the Assam region that is white in color. Here, teh natural process does not necessitate the killling of the pupa inside its cocoon. The silk is white and of superb quality. Why not use ERI SILK for clothes used during worship, for which Mulberry Silk is favored at present.
Conch shells, kasturika [musk] and chaamara [yak tails] all are the products of DELIBERATE COMMERCIAL KILLING of the animals that produce such. SO also are peacock feathers, used indiscrinately in worship. Is it logical to beleive that yaks and male peacocks voluntarily donate their tails or feathers, and in such commercila quantities? Are we being hypocritical when we ignore the wholesale killing of conches for their shells? The musk deer is greatly endangered, as is well known in India. A mature male produces musk as a sexual attractant. There is no way to not kill this animal to extract musk. Srimat Valmiki was pained at the sight of a hunter taking advantage of the mating rituals of two birds, their awareness of the external world gone in the intensity of their love. He cried out, mA niShAda, and the rest is history. Obviously, he would not sanction the killing of beings who are endowed by NAture with properties essential to their mating. Why are we selective in our interpretation of what is sacred and what is not?
I should love to hear others comment on these issues. Namaskar. Hare Srinivasa