Even biased view with some logic to back them up are worth positive treatment.

At present, there is no scarcity for resources and reading materials.

However, people should have the basic educational and intellectual background to enable themselves to study the material, to read and understand the commentaries in various languages, evaluating conflicting interpretations .Then they would come to a reasonably balanced evaluation.

At least the person who considers the issue should be capable of locating and studying all or a majority of the materials espousing various schools of thought on the subject, and understanding the logic applied by various votaries in support of their divergent views..

After this study in some depth, either the student or reader may accept one from out of the variety of views, or alternately he can apply his own mind and could arrive at his own independent conclusion.

Even biased view with some logic to back them up are worth positive treatment.

However, nowadays we tend to quote some book or author, and even without reading or understanding the content, we just give out our own opinion and ascribe or attribute that view to the author whose name we happened to see, or a link that we happened to come across. In addition, the reader and the audience too just lap up such views without caring to do any crosscheck.

This is the in thing in this era of information explosion through new media outlets.